In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is believed by some, in a list of countries, that what money should primarily be spent on is the construction of new railways for fast trains between cities. However, other people believe that improving public transport is what money should be used for. In the first place, railway lines represent a fast and effective transport method used to link cities and countries in a small amount of them. Up to the present time, People who live far from their working places use trains every day to reach them on time, to travel and to explore countries, and this makes the improvement of very fast railways an important issue that has not to be undervalued. These types of trains run faster than any other type of public transportation facilities, and this makes them more reliable. They stop only at major stations and are not delayed. At the same time, public transport does not have to be neglected either, some others may say. Fast developing towns and megalopolis could invest their money in improving urban transportation services, and this could also solve the issue of traffic blocks. That means if public transport gets more reliable, more people will start using it, reducing the use of personal vehicles. Buses and metros are always cheap, and if only they could be improved, they would be used as a primary way of transport around the cities. In conclusion, I believe that governments should invest both in building new and fast railways, but also in upgrading their existing modes of transport because they are both required by citizens, workers, and tourist.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8984962406 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57391439887 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575187969925 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.852108471 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.454545455 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387679754682 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151133969874 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129650872423 0.0667982634062 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.387679754682 0.151304729494 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.