Nowadays, huge amount of money are spent by governments both for improving existing public transport and for constructing new railway lines between cities. Many people consider that large amount of money must spend for constructing new railway lines while others disagree with that notion, they think that large sums of money must be used for improving public transport that already exist. This essay will analyse both sides of the argument before arriving at a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, rail communication is safer, faster and can connect cities and towns for building better communication than the conventional road transport systems. To explain it further, trains can carry a great number of passengers and goods at a time and can remarkably reduce the traffic congestion. That is why, many people think that more money should be allocated for constructing new train lines.
On the other hand, other people think that national budget should be utilised on improving the public transport for the sake of the better communication for mass people. They believe that primary reasons of why transportation vehicles are not utilised in daily life are because of not being comfortable and being very old. That is why, there are raffic congestion on streets, because public transport are not using effectively. They think that by improving existing public transport, they can eliminate trafffic jams.
In my own perspective, I personally believe that national budget should be fairly distributed both for improving existing public transport and for constructing new railway lines.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.392 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76580259599 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2348804185 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.545454545 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467253935522 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17988194053 0.084324248473 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149547414928 0.0667982634062 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285309948804 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118509747095 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.