In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many people have called into question whether it is far critical to devote a large budget for building new railway lines or developing current public transport. Although some people make an assertion that large amount of money is required to promote current public transport, I assume that government ought to invest large amount of money on constructing new railway lines to pass the distances in faster pace.
On one hand, some people believe that the money is needed to enhace the existing public transport. That is, applied for public people’s commuting on a daily basis, a large-scale of public transport needs to have more budget for its improvement in order to reduce erosion. Almost many urban areas are encountering with public transport erosion which imposses exorbident expenditure to government. Indeed, these expensive expenses include cost of repairing, maintaining and even replacing with new ones. In fact, not only does spending money to promote public transport possibly trigger to longer life expectancy of them, but also it allegiates the costs of governments.
On the other hand, governments require to spend money on new railways lines infrastruction for new trains between cities. If provide in shorter time and faster speed, the possibility of travelling between areas tends to bring about agreat number of benefits to their citizens. Crossing the distances between cities in high speed leads to reduce the time when you are in the way. By reduction of time on travelling between cities, the large number of people increasingly tend to travel on far-fetched cities. This increase of tourists in far-distance areas is likely to contribute to economic of local people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
... On the other hand, governments require to spend money on new railways lines infrastruct...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in fact, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31111111111 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79531255691 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2548485055 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388491564268 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135499693478 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109800407965 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248706283637 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315530903992 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.