Old generations often hold some traditional ideas on the correct way of life thinking and behavior However some people think that it is not helpful for the young generations to prepare for modern life in the future What s your opinion

Essay topics:

Old generations often hold some traditional ideas on the correct way of life, thinking and behavior. However, some people think that it is not helpful for the young generations to prepare for modern life in the future. What‘s your opinion?

Generation gap has been a debated issue since the dawn of civilization. I partially agree with this statement. Modern life has changed beyond recognition in many ways and so many ideas of the old generation are not suitable for today‘s life, but still there are some traditional ideas which are evergreen and hold true even today.
The elderly had a very disciplined life. For instance, they believed in sticking to one job for life. They also believed in fixed-hours job. They had a stress-free work life. Moreover, they believed that marriage was for life. Divorces were rare. They had a stable family life. These values, if followed, are good for today‘s generation also.
However, in many ways the ideas of the elderly are obsolete in the times of modernity. The elderly live like a frog in the well. They forget that change is progress. They also want their children to follow the same profession. They do not give importance to aptitude. Youngsters are more intellectually evolved. They want to explore the un-trodden path to face the cut-throat competition of today.
Furthermore, the young differ in dress, food and habits. These things were not available to the elderly. The elderly had lesser opportunities to come in contact with the western world. The earth was a big planet. Now it is a global village. The young speak a universal language, eat Italian pizza and Chinese food and wear a universal dress. The leisurely ways of the old are gone. The young have the speed of bikes, cars and planes. What can link them to the old bullock cart? The young today have to change to survive.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, there are some traditional ideas of the elderly that are evergreen and will hold true for times to come. But, in many ways, they are obsolete in today‘s time.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...llowed, are good for today‘s generation also. However, in many ways the ideas of th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...children to follow the same profession. They do not give importance to aptitude. You...
^^^^
Line 4, column 382, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...The leisurely ways of the old are gone. The young have the speed of bikes, cars and...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, as for, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78025477707 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60335270996 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 16.0721442886 187% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 20.2975951904 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9497044906 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 50.0333333333 106.682146367 47% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.4666666667 20.7667163134 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.8 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 3.4128256513 469% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254106577138 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529313309863 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729978488314 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140898884858 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928975703192 0.056905535591 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.3 13.0946893788 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.79 50.2224549098 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.3001002004 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.96 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.1190380762 59% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 10.7795591182 56% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...llowed, are good for today‘s generation also. However, in many ways the ideas of th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...children to follow the same profession. They do not give importance to aptitude. You...
^^^^
Line 4, column 382, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...The leisurely ways of the old are gone. The young have the speed of bikes, cars and...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, as for, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78025477707 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60335270996 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 16.0721442886 187% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 20.2975951904 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9497044906 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 50.0333333333 106.682146367 47% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.4666666667 20.7667163134 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.8 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 3.4128256513 469% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254106577138 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529313309863 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729978488314 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140898884858 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928975703192 0.056905535591 163% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.3 13.0946893788 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.79 50.2224549098 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.3001002004 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.96 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.1190380762 59% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 10.7795591182 56% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.