On one hand, Red Bull’s mid-season driver change is unlikely to have any impact on the 2020 driver market. But on the other, it could mix things up a treat…
Albon to Red Bull: His best moments in F1 so far
The second option, if Albon fails to stay close to Verstappen, leaving the team’s HR team with more paperwork to do, is to look elsewhere. But where would Red Bull turn in such a scenario? After overlooking Daniil Kvyat to replace Pierre Gasly, having previously demoted the Russian, it’s unlikely they will recall Gasly, no matter how well he does in the remainder of 2019.
However, the Red Bull young driver cupboard is bare – and they won’t want to promote someone outside of F1 without having had a stint at Toro Rosso unless it’s a very big name. That is, after all, what that team exists for.
Option 2: Tempt a former driver to return to the fold
They say never go back – but is this what Red Bull have to do? Do they try and lure Carlos Sainz back to the fold, considering his impressive performance since joining McLaren? They might but in doing so, they would have to admit they made a mistake. Unlikely. It’s also highly doubtful Sainz will leave, so happy is he at McLaren, who have already confirmed the Spaniard as part of their 2020 line-up.
Could Red Bull tempt Daniel Ricciardo back? The Australian is not enjoying tremendous success in his first year at Renault. While he would have anticipated life would be more challenging, he perhaps wouldn’t have expected it to be this bad. Ricciardo has a deal for next year, but might be keen. To get him out of Renault, Red Bull would have to get the cheque book out to release him.
Would it be worth giving Ferrari’s Sebastian Vettel a call? The German won four titles with them, of course, and has a good relationship with his former colleagues. But, like Ricciardo, they would have to find a way to convince him to come back and his team to release him, given he has a contract for next year. Though Vettel has so far failed to land the title he so craves with Ferrari, you get the impression he hasn’t lost patience yet.
READ MORE: Ferrari have homework to do after lacklustre Hungarian GP, says Vettel
That’s the realistic ex-Red Bull pool exhausted. What about their Honda links? As it stands, only Naoki Yamamoto is eligible for a superlicence. At 31 and with no F1 experience, Red Bull will not take a chance on him come this time next year. Honda’s other drivers, such as F2’s Nobuharu Matsushita, do not have enough points – and are therefore out of the running.
Option 3: Look outside the Red Bull family
So this leaves the team facing doing something they’ve not done since hiring Mark Webber in 2007 – look outside the Red Bull family for a driver. There was chatter that Nico Hulkenberg was in the frame to replace Gasly earlier this season, but that was swiftly denied by those involved. He hasn’t had a vintage year this year and it remains unclear whether Renault even want him beyond this campaign, with Esteban Ocon linked to the French outfit.
The Red Bull family had previously been interested in Lando Norris, having tried to place him at Toro Rosso, but the Briton is committed to McLaren. Could someone like Sergio Perez, who in the past has been of interest to Ferrari and Mercedes, suddenly come into play? He says he wants to stay at Racing Point, but the lure of Red Bull and a car to compete for top honours would be hard to turn down. Equally, Red Bull would be getting a driver who is ruthlessly consistent and more than capable of taking his opportunities.
READ MORE: Swap shop – drivers who switched teams mid-season
If Mercedes opt to keep Valtteri Bottas for another year, Ocon could cut his ties with the Silver Arrows, but given his history with Max Verstappen – see last year’s Brazilian Grand Prix (below) – it’s highly unlikely Red Bull would go for him. But might they be willing to take the risk given how highly he is rated? It’s not as if they are against taking risks…
>
Verstappen and Ocon collide in Brazil
Romain Grosjean would be a very left-field choice, but his stock has gone up since it emerged he had been pushing his team to return to the Australia-spec, which they did two races ago and had a positive impact as it was quicker than their upgraded spec. The Frenchman, on his day, is very quick. Might the chance at a team that will give him the car for a regular podium, like he had at Lotus, be just what he needs?
Or might Red Bull take a punt on his Haas team mate Kevin Magnussen? The Dane has been reborn since joining the American outfit and is highly rated internally. At 26, he’s still got plenty of time left to improve and has been impressive in the last couple of years, particularly this term in qualifying.
So while Red Bull’s reserves may be depleted and their options on former recruits limited to highly unlikely, there are a couple of options if they think outside the box. The latter would be forced upon them, which won’t go down well but might actually have a silver lining. You can bet they’ll be hoping Option 1 - Albon - works out
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem.What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respo 73
- Analysts tell us that many people today feel stressed and think they haveinsufficient control over their lives. What problems do such feelings cause forpeople? What remedies could you suggest? 78
- Playing a musical instrument is one of the most important achievements forany child. To what extent do you agree with this statement. 100
- On one hand, Red Bull’s mid-season driver change is unlikely to have any impact on the 2020 driver market. But on the other, it could mix things up a treat… 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., after all, what that team exists for. Option 2: Tempt a former driver to retur...
^^^
Line 6, column 72, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
... this what Red Bull have to do? Do they try and lure Carlos Sainz back to the fold, con...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et the cheque book out to release him. Would it be worth giving Ferrari's ...
^^^
Line 11, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...– and are therefore out of the running. Option 3: Look outside the Red Bull fami...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, after all, as for, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 13.1623246493 274% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 7.85571142285 344% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 80.0 24.0651302605 332% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 111.0 41.998997996 264% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4177.0 1615.20841683 259% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 898.0 315.596192385 285% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65144766147 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.47418013291 4.20363070211 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45650434159 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 435.0 176.041082164 247% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484409799555 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1233.9 506.74238477 243% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 10.0 0.809619238477 1235% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 41.0 16.0721442886 255% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3397686297 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.87804878 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9024390244 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21951219512 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.38176352705 411% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 3.4128256513 381% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200463001661 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522765269618 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487021818945 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828446004784 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040688099732 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 188.0 78.4519038076 240% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.