One long distance of planes consumes more than a car and it can pollute environment more than cars. Therefore the unnecessary flight such as tourist travelling should be discouraged than limit the car use. Do you agree or disagree?
Airplanes use more of fossil gases for its fuels which can have severe environmental effects more than that of vehicles. To forbid this horrifying condition, the reduction in the use of flight seems to be taken into consideration. I believe that, the state should seek for other alternative solutions, because only limiting unnecessary flights will not hamper the toxic gas usages.
The amount of fossil gases used in airplanes is way more than that of cars. For example, the UK survey had announced that the airplane used of about 2.5 billion gallons of fossil gases in a year whereas vehicle took about 500 gallons and this usage is increasing every year. With this much of fossil gases can affect hugely to the atmosphere creating global warnings. As a result, the reduction of fossil gases in airplanes should be restricted in order to save the environment.
In contrast, the state cannot prevent all the airplanes from using of fossil gases especially by restricting the number of tourists, because of financial reasons. If the state restricts unnecessary travelers, the number of tourists will be reduced and the travelling related businesses such as hotels, travelling agents and restaurants will suffer from the loss of possible customers.
Furthermore, restricting unnecessary flights only will not have an impact on environments, because majority of flights are not for travelling. In the Australia as an example, the highest reason for travelling response was education of 89% followed by business of 78% and the touring reason was 46% of responses. It is apparent that by looking at this survey, the unnecessary travelling only took a small part of total flights and thus, the restricting of unnecessary flights will not restrict the fossil gas usages.
In conclusion, the toxic gases releasing from flights can destroy environments and atmosphere hugely, but restricting the unnecessary flights to prevent the releasing of toxic gases will not be effective because majority of people are using airplanes for other reasons than just travelling.
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology for outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Shopping is dangerous because it makes people selfish and careless with money. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of wate used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 73
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'furthermore', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'thus', 'whereas', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.273480662983 0.247107183377 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.146408839779 0.155533422707 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0745856353591 0.0946595960268 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0580110497238 0.0501214627716 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00828729281768 0.0437548338989 19% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.165745856354 0.122226691241 136% => OK
Participles: 0.0635359116022 0.0403226058552 158% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88167377651 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0138121546961 0.0326793684256 42% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.104972375691 0.0861772015684 122% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0331491712707 0.021408717616 155% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00276243093923 0.011925033212 23% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2061.0 1933.35771543 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 316.048096192 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.26443768997 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20517956788 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.398176291793 0.374742101984 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.316109422492 0.28420135186 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.215805471125 0.203846283523 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.170212765957 0.137316102897 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88167377651 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.037074148 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492401215805 0.56093040696 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.2609936725 60.7387585426 83% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 25.3076923077 20.7743622355 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5793766498 49.517814964 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.538461538 127.492653851 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7743622355 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.814263465372 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 56.9186345569 49.1944974215 116% => OK
Elegance: 2.36363636364 1.69124875643 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29281341612 0.332605444948 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.145391417536 0.102741220458 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0738156301937 0.0668466124924 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.667678334083 0.534860350844 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142092047185 0.148594505496 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144012109895 0.134430193775 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535508940743 0.0742795772207 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.425124301605 0.324371583561 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0158465422692 0.0638462369009 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203435078364 0.228012699653 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025614261618 0.058150111329 44% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.68436873747 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 5.90881763527 17% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.5751503006 233% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.