One way to solve the problem of congestion on the roads is to increase the tax on private vehicles. How could this alleviate congestion? What other measures can you suggest to deal with congestion in cities?
For the last few years, there has been an overwhelming increase in the number of private vehicles, which leads to traffic congestion. To eradicate this issue, it is thought that the tax on the individual transportation should be mushroomed. My following essay will clarify how effective the above-mentioned solution is as well as suggest other possible measures.
To commence with, at the first glance, the rise in tax on personal converyance may be a good idea because it helps ease a handful of private vehicles. Nonetheless, it seems not to be high-yielding in the long run. In fact, this method often has adverse influence on the middle class and the poor who have very few means of transportation whereas personal vehicles especially cars are often owned by the upper class who are willing to spend a large of sum on tax to utilize their own conveyance.
Therefore, I suggest several alternatives to alleviate the congestion. Firstly, the government should invest more money to construct more new modern roads as well as reinforce the old and backward ones. Roads must be divided into different lanes for each type of vehicles and annually they need to be checked carefully to ensure the best quality for traffic participants. Finally, strict penalties and laws have to be enforced to punish transportation encroaching on the lanes and carrying overweight which can cause traffic congestion and insecurity.
To encapsulate, I do not think that increasing tax on private vehicles is ideal. Instead, other measures as what I have suggested should be looked into. Maybe, they are more effective than people expected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-19 | Koshal singh | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | lily2002 | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | lily2002 | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | annatran12324 | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | annatran12324 | 11 | view |
- In some developing countries, it is difficult to get good teachers to work in rural areas which can have a negative impact on the education of children in those rural communities. Why do you think good teachers do not want to work in rural areas in develo 78
- Health care should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of a person is in their own hands and they should therefore be held accountable for that Do you agree with this opinion 80
- Accommodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas Do advantages outweigh disadvantages 87
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern life style which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicines should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree? 61
- Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries What are the causes of this What solutions can be offered 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'few means'.
Suggestion: few means
...middle class and the poor who have very few means of transportation whereas personal vehi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, whereas, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14339622642 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9965068069 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618867924528 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2039924761 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.846153846 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189706450802 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06088097717 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413556314866 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109194934792 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303276507093 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.