One way to solve the problem of congestion on the roads is to increase the tax on private vehicles. How could this alleviate congestion? What other measures can you suggest to deal with congestion in cities?
The traffic snarl-up is a cause of widespread concern today, as many commuters have been struggling with. Tax hike on private transport may shoulder the financial burden of vehicle ownership, leading reducing traffic levels and congestion. In addition, there are various solutions that may also combat traffic density, particularly in metropolitan cities. The following essay will support my opinion with additional information.
Imposing the higher tax on individual transport owners from the government may affect considerably on volume of transport. The exorbitant cost of purchasing and maintenance expenses for a private transport may motive a significant shift in demand toward the more affordable option, sustainable transport like buses. For instance, Singapore has eased traffic issues by forcing a 100 percent tax on cars. Furthermore, Public infrastructure capacity should accommodate sufficiently for a rapidly growing population that may support this proposal to a large extent.
Additionally, there is probably the most another effective solution that is to offer tax incentives for individuals' public transport expenses. Popular in the US has gained support from the policy marker which overlooks the overwhelming triple bottom line benefits associated with public transport use and reduced urban congestion. Limiting the number of vehicles possessed each household is the solution for this phenomenon. For example, For instance, Singapore is to cap personal transport on its streets and harder for approval from the state to buy new cars. Finally, ride-hailing or car-pool services like Uber, Grab and so on, have been utilized widely across the world. Not only could these platforms support to ease the volume of transport as well as traffic problems, but they also create more job opportunities among citizens.
In conclusion, the imposition of the higher tax on personal transport and tax incentives for public transport, limiting vehicles ownerships and application technology are the various effective methods that tackle the traffic problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-19 | Koshal singh | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | lily2002 | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | lily2002 | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | annatran12324 | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | annatran12324 | 11 | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- the chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 200 2019 and future 2025 92
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pport this proposal to a large extent. Additionally, there is probably the most...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, look, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76221498371 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00181556185 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609120521173 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4010482051 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.933333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0560035847475 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222718297772 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0133328644109 0.0667982634062 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0400121536421 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00663113487046 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.