Recently, online education is considered as the best way for many countries due to the Covid 19 pandemic. Online education not only protect students from the dangerous pandemic but also have a lot of advantages. Therefore, some people believe that online education will replace face to face education. However, I think face to face education can not be replaced by online education.
First of all, online education still has some issues. Teachers and students always facing with network conection problem which interupts the teaching and learning processing. For example, sometimes the internet connection is very slow, so the students are not able to understand the whole lecture in the online class. They also recieve email from the teacher too late and can not complete the assignments that their teachers required. Besides, the students under fifteen years old are too young to have the ability to use smartphone or laptop for studying. Although their parents will help them, they still have a lot of troubles when studying on technology devices. Studying online also adversely affects the health of students. They have to sit in front of the screen of smartphone or laptop for hours, so they can have some eye diseases. Additionally, teachers also have difficulty in managing their students when teaching online.
Moreover, there are some benefits of face to face education that online education do not have. Studying at home is not the same as studying at school. When studying online at home, students cannot feel the serious atmosphere in the classroom. They are dominated by the things around them and do not focus on the lesson. When going to school, students will have to follow the rules there and will take their studies more seriously. Besides, face to face education give students the chance to communicate with their classmates and others. That help them developing their communication skill. When students go to school, they will taker part in many activities that online classes do not have. After studying, students can play sports together, participate in art club or dacing club and so on. School is the best environment for students to develop their all-round skills.
In conclusion, online education can not replace face to face education although it has many benefits. During the Covid 19 pandemic, teaching and studying online is an effective solution for education. However, online education has caused many problems and face to face education is still the best way. I hope that students can back to school after the pandemic.
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Online education is becoming more and more popular Some people claim that e learning has so many benefit that it will replace face to face education Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable Discuss both view and give your opinion 56
- People nowadays spend their free time less actively than in the past Do you agree or disagree 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to process'.
Suggestion: to process
...ich interupts the teaching and learning processing. For example, sometimes the internet co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teachers required. Besides, the students under fifteen years old are too young to...
^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[8]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...r classmates and others. That help them developing their communication skill. When student...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14423076923 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60961166459 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3960485443 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.2592592593 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4074074074 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.48148148148 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306111958978 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105547577272 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132653871819 0.0667982634062 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242973366277 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10685986855 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.