Online, people write opinions and reviews of services. Is it a good thing or bad thing.?
It is true that, people often establish their opinion about the product or services online for reviewing others or express happiness. However, in this essay explain that, this positive innovative trend often make people to aware about service quality and products quantity, and most probably the companies to know about the feedback. Since, getting impression from the customers would lead to enhancement of service and let allow them to improvise the wrong comments.
Opinion or feedback makes up everything to betterment and flourish the overwhelming development to the core. In other words, service provided by certain area or purchased product newly, should always need recognition to go forward and make more advance. Many people make comments of services whether it is good or bad, or actually how they felt the services make to clarify the failure and feel credit if it is success. For instance, telephone company introduce customer service station to help clients in dilemma of new features makes tremendous replays from customers that lead to double the profit of company on that year. Along with some negative effects of services they could remove and renovate company secretory reports on media.
Similarly, many services and products has limitation to access and some times experience severe technical errors during use. In brief , unlikely, letters or phone call feedback might delay the process and fail to co ordinate each agreements in some extend. While, online feedback would be fast and secure for both the customers and entrepreneur at a time by information super high way. For example, marketing service feedback of hotel booking site like "Trivago" often reply suddenly the customers queries and suggestions. By the virtue of that, most significant site of booking site of hotel was this which makes dealers happy and company thrive.
To sum up, views of services through internet or modern technology enhance not only the company development but also customers. At once, old customers to reveal about service and new customers to compare the service with others, moreover company could have advantage too.
- 1 IN MANY WORKPLACES ONLINE COMMUNICATION IS BECOMING MORE COMMONPLACE THAN FACE TO FACE MEETINGS TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THIS STATEMENT 56
- The pie charts show figures for the use of public libraries in 1990 and 2000 in Britain Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 55
- The given pie charts provide information about the number of journal articles read per week by all students, undergraduates, and PhD students at a Canadian College in 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make co 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...re technical errors during use. In brief , unlikely, letters or phone call feedbac...
^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
... to co ordinate each agreements in some extend. While, online feedback would be fast a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, while, for example, for instance, in brief, in other words, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 24.0 6.8 353% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 965.302439024 187% => OK
No of words: 338.0 196.424390244 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35207100592 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67365036916 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 106.607317073 191% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 283.868780488 203% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3637229436 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0510975388648 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0200468504667 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386592545235 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0320558538204 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326080654514 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 40.7170731707 243% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.