The amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
The pie chart illustrates the information of USA-based children's charity received from various resources and the total expense in 2016. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, the total amount of money received was higher than the expenses in which donation was the major resource and most of the money was spent on program services.
Regarding revenue resources, 86.6% received in terms of donated food while government grants and investment income contribute a mere 0.2% each. Along with that, community contributions account for around 10.4% and program revenue was 2.2% in 2016. Moreover, children's charities receive money from other income was 0.4% and in the total amount was 53,561,580$ in the given year.
With regards to the expenses, the overwhelming majority of money spent on program services was 95.8%. However, the least amount of money was used for management and general which is about 1.4%. Apart from that, expenses for fundraising comprise 2.6% in 2016. Furthermore, the total expenses of USA located children's charity were 53,224,896$ in the period given.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rious resources and the total expense in 2016. Units are measured in percentage. ...
^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$580'.
Suggestion: $580
...0.4% and in the total amount was 53,561,580$ in the given year. With regards to...
^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and in the total amount was 53,561,580$ in the given year. With regards to t...
^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$896'.
Suggestion: $896
...A located childrens charity were 53,224,896$ in the period given.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, moreover, regarding, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44378698225 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66415477554 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.154945835 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340348475229 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122850397671 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882873208227 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210721631362 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307043946402 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.