The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
How to improve road safety is a hotly debated topic that often divides opinions. Imposing severe punishments on those who commit driving offences, to me, can somehow help increase road safety, yet there are more efficient measures that need to be taken into account.
On the one hand, it is worth noticing that around 80% of accidents are caused by driver errors thus firm penalties imposed on drivers can deter them from committing more driving offences. For example, in Vietnam, the number of car crashes due to drunk drivers has been reduced significantly since the ratification of laws against alcoholic driving. Besides, regulations abolishing the use of mobile phones, which causes various distractions, while controlling a vehicle has contributed to diminishing driving casualties. In addition, penalties for dangerous drivers are believed to possibly prevent them relapsing into the same offence.
On the other hand, I take the view that there are several methods that can equally improve road security. Firstly, CCTV cameras should be installed across the motorways in order to put the misbehaviours of drivers under surveillance and carry out discipline instantaneously when there is any sign of infringement. Secondly, education is always the main contributing factor to solving problems stemming from consciousness thus educative campaigns for raising the awareness of people about the need to follow transporting rules, as well as the importance of road safety, should be launched. Finally, it is also reckoned that accident number is directly influenced by the condition of transportation infrastructures such as motorways and highways so great importance from the governments should be attached to facilities to maintain road safety.
In conclusion, while adopting harsher sanctions could alleviate the situation of car crashes deaths and rates, there are other methods that should be implemented along with it to thoroughly tackle the road safety issue.
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them 89
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Increasing travels between countries enable people to learn different cultures or to increase tension between people from different countries 90
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53311258278 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00410702309 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635761589404 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8144652894 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.909090909 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.3636363636 7.06120827912 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0987707845498 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408408342931 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039973463947 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668016176047 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438458058597 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53311258278 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00410702309 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635761589404 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8144652894 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.909090909 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.3636363636 7.06120827912 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0987707845498 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408408342931 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039973463947 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668016176047 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438458058597 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.