People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns?
In this day and age, urban dwellers are confronted with endless repercussions in their life, which is attributed to overpopulation. It is my firm conviction that encouragement for those inhabitants to move to suburban and rural regions would be efficient to alleviate this circumstance.
Relentless influxes of people from other provinces and even foreigners, coupled with the growing population of cities themselves, have exacerbated the high population density in every large municipality. As a result, people would take on stiff competition for employment, greatly contributing to depression, stress, and other mental disorders. Whereas the most talented or competent applicants are recruited, regardless of the fact that their receivables might be unfeasible to cover living expenses, the remainders would conduct illegal manoeuvres to make ends meet. Additionally, due to enormous demands for transportation as well as the centralization of factories, metropolises emerged as epicentres of pollution and diseases. For instance, during the covid-19 pandemic, owing to space constraints and the severe discrepancy of quantity between medical personnel and the infected, campaigns for combating and diminishing appeared a daunting task to both individuals and society as a whole.
I, consequently, would argue that efforts to appease the overpopulation in urban settings should be made by granting incentives to those relocating in smaller regional provinces. Speaking of which, there would be more empty spaces for cultivating plants, fighting off air pollution, and structuring communal areas, giving a rise to people’s interactions and rejuvenation after hard work. Moreover, as infrastructure overload is relieved, ceaseless constructions creating heavy dust would be reduced and there would be no longer long lines of patients waiting for an available ward in hospitals. People who settle down and start businesses in small regional places would be able to enjoy the tranquillity while making an escape from the hustle and bustle of daily life in megacities.
In conclusion, there are multifarious issues arising from city life thus motivating people to leave and settle down in other decentralized regions should be carried out by governments to address this matter.
- Increasing travels between countries enable people to learn different cultures or to increase tension between people from different countries 90
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 89
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, speaking of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75147928994 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28478588095 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659763313609 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.142080737 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.0 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160244383903 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576524022397 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456295991788 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10596667733 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353248097615 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.