In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and this may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the advantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
In a number of countries around the world, small shops in town cannot compete with wholesale stores based on the outskirts and are threatened with bankruptcy. This leads to a number of consequences, including a rise in car usage in these countries and access to large out-of-town stores becoming limited for those without cars. While there are positives to this change, I believe the negatives are more significant.
On the one hand, the tendency towards shopping outside urban areas may have some benefits. Taking the fact that not all towners possess a car into account, driving to a distant place for shopping is inefficient thus they are likely to do online shopping on hi-tech appliances, which is contributed to the proliferation of e-commerce and delivery services. For example, enabling customers to approach more options of goods of any kind, e-commerce platforms such as Shopee and Lazada have seen a substantial surge in the number of users as well as their use frequencies. Additionally, with personnel demand for car manufacturing and upkeep accelerating, more and more job vacancies in the field and its related including mechanics, drivers, engineers, etc. are offered to dwellers of the town.
On the other hand, though several vacancies stemming from the trend of shopping in the outskirts are available, these occur in a very limited field. Meanwhile, most inhabitants who are in-town customers would incur higher shipping expenses. Moreover, in the worst scenario, their safety is also at risk when the delivery of necessities such as pharmaceutical products is delayed in emergency circumstances. Another existential threat to dwellers when retailers are off-centre is the degraded air quality. Due to the upsurge of cars and means of delivery, airborne pollutants, emitted from vehicles’ engines, would overwhelmingly rise, heightening pollution levels in those places and exacerbating respiratory diseases such as lung cancer, pulmonary fibrosis, and so on.
In conclusion, though the propensity towards shopping in large stores located away from city centres would offer some gains, its potential repercussions are more consequential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | NHU95 | 78 | view |
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ited field. Meanwhile, most inhabitants who are in-town customers would incur higher sh...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48203592814 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06951066613 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2122515721 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.785714286 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25372394091 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786544200002 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801030679198 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147238990501 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918492235042 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.