The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree

People have different views about how to make our roads safer. Personally, I disagree with the view that imposing stricter punishments is the only way to improve road safety because there is a range of other measures which can be used together to do this effectively.

Stricter punishments can certainly deter drivers from driving dangerously on the roads. There have been numerous of road accidents which are the inevitable consequences of carelessness or dangerously. For example, many young people drive a car while intoxicated or use a mobile phone while driving. The penalties for driving offenders can act as a deterrent, so that many drivers will think twice about avoiding traffic offenses. Various types of driving penalties such as heavy fines, the confiscation of driving licenses or even a prison sentence should be adopted with dangerous drivers. The harsh punishments can make drivers follow the road rules and drive more carefully.

Nevertheless, I believe that the use of alternative measures by national and local authorities can promote driving safety. Firstly, it is essential to educate people properly before they start to drive. In order to ensure drivers to be aware of implementing the letter of the law strictly, these educational programs could be done in schools or in more difficult driving tests. As a result, the number of road accidents caused by teenagers may be declined in communities. Secondly, many governments around the world have succeeded in using traffic calming measures such as speed bumps, road bends, speed cameras to reduce the number of road accidents, especially in built-up areas. Finally, governments or local councils could invest more in better public transport, which would mean that fewer people would need to work or travel by their private vehicles.

In conclusion, it is not enough to improve road safety by punishing more harshly driving offenders. I believe that other road safety measures should also be introduced and used effectively.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (4 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30817610063 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8255027595 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9150239341 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233939276868 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801099588978 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759414396443 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168213112104 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069133936466 0.056905535591 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.