The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Various people opine that the unique solution improving safety of route is to apply manifold rigorous penalties for driving offenders. In my perspective, I partly concur with such opinion.
My agreement with adapting the more severe fine for driving crime is ostensibly attributable to some factors. The most conspicuous one is that nowadays the more society thrives, the worse the consciousness of commuters, such alarming trend posing a great threat on safety of traffic participants. Particularly, an enormous number of people are died and injured annually, such situation being engendered by hazardous accidents. Besides, the fact that people do not obey the traffic law is major cause leading to deficiency of safety of our roads. Therefore, adapting extremely strict punishments would contribute to reducing violations of the traffic rules, hence restriction of numerous casualties. Apart from that, the government could establish much stricter penalties in order to punish criminal drivers, revoking their driving license or putting throw them in prison, for example.
On the other hand, there are some reasons for my disagreement with the idea that giving the more severe fine is the best way to improve safety of our route. The first one is that the qualification of traffic road not reach basis standard could put people under danger of commuting. For instance, potholes, bumpy and narrow roads still exist everywhere, such fact triggering a lack of safety for commuters. Additionally, the authorities might invest national budget in upgrading infrastructure, thereby ensuring safety of various roads. Regarding last reason, means of communication could appeal to dwellers for using public transportations for the purpose of declining traffic jam in peak hours.
For the aforementioned discussions, it is clear that beside chastising driving crime there are a plenty of solutions to ameliorate safety of our roads.
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 90
- Student should live with parents or live away when studying at university. Agree or disagree? 89
- The chart below shows the top ten countries with the highest spending on travel in 2014 64
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentages of books, by type, that were borrowed over this time. 67
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...authorities might invest national budget in upgrading infrastructure, thereby ens...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, apart from, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54391891892 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99096979125 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3520967368 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247777820976 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768043360401 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584862290199 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146225542311 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268302695609 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.