The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
Nowadays, the traditional family meals fallen into oblivion increasingly. In my essay, I would like to indicate some reasons triggering the issue and the reverberations of the concerned problem.
The fact that family members rarely have meals together is ostensibly attributable to some factors. The most conspicuous one is that in this day and age, because of the hectic pace of modern life, people seem to be swept into the maelstrom of working and studying. Particularly, parents must devote a great amount of time earning money and their siblings would have inclination for participating in extracurricular classes. This trend could deprive people of spending spare time getting together to eat tasty meals. Beside that, the explanation for such disappearance could be difference of living schedule between parents and children. For example, family members would fix an appointment with their collaborators and friends for the purpose of consolidating their social bonds and releasing their pressure after arduous working and studying days. Apart from that, the scanty time budget might discourage people from cooking for their own family, instead of fast food or restaurant meals. The last reason is that the tradition that family gets together to eat meals disappeared can be justified by distinction about thought and lifestyle of generations in family.
Owing to the aforementioned causes, deficiency of family meals engenders some alarming consequences. The first is that family members would be a lack of opportunity in order to converse and share with one another on a daily basis. This restriction might create an enormous amount of emotional distance between parents and offspring, thereby splitting affection. Additionally, children would not be educated manifold valuable lessons through traditional meals such as the politeness, the tact and bearing each other, that fact establishing numerous bad habits in perception of people from young generations. Furthermore, outside meals which are not ensured food sanitary could lead to not only spendthrift money but also digestive illnesses.
In conclusion, both parents and offspring play an integral role in improving and terminating the discussed issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | The Lazy Tiger | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | hammy | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Anh Nguyen 2604 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | nhathoa | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | ngotrancamtu | 61 | view |
- In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses. Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas. Do the advanta 78
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Most people try to balance between their work and other parts of their lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance. What are the reason for this and what can be done to solve this? 84
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students. Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Most people try to balance between their work and other parts of their lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance. What are the reason for this and what can be done to solve this? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58875739645 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99681360373 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60650887574 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1407127172 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183245442838 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656020536034 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824326978859 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982775825964 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607839110974 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.