The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentages of books, by type, that were borrowed over this time.

Essay topics:

The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentages of books, by type, that were borrowed over this time.

The given line graph describes the quantities of books which people rented from four rural libraries between June and September in 2014. The pie chart demonstrates the proportions of kinds of books that rented by residents during surveyed period.
Overall, the figures for numbers of books borrowed in four countryside libraries moved up and down erratically. Besides, the percentages of type of books about fiction is highest in those libraries.
Regarding the line graph, the quantity of books that were rented in Ryeslip ranked first at 300 books in June, followed by the figure for Sutton Wood at 250 books. The numbers of books borrowed in West Eaton and Church Mount shared the third position at 50 books. The figure for West Eaton increased gradually from 50 to 150 books between June and August. Similarly, the data for Church Mount witnessed a moderate rise from 50 to around 120 books in the same period. In contrast, the number of book rented in Ryeslip decreased moderately to 200 books from June and August. On the other hand, after growing slightly from 250 to about 280 books from June to July, the figure for Sutton Wood dropped significantly to 100 books in August and its peak of 300 books in September. The figure for Ryeslip located in the second position at 170 books. The quantities of books borrowed in West Easton and Church Mount shared the third level at 150 books.
Concerning the pie chart, the percentages of books about history which people rented was exactly equal to the figure for science at 14 percent. Compared with these two figures, the proportion of biography books borrowed was minimally higher at 19 percent. The figure for fiction was the highest at 43 percent and quadruple the figure for self-help.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-14 Janu1998 78 view
2019-07-24 nhathoa 67 view
2019-05-19 r.hojat 78 view
2019-04-11 Prabhjot Sanghera 67 view
2018-09-22 Hyacinthos 73 view
Essays by user nhathoa :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, regarding, second, similarly, third, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 296.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89527027027 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46350044844 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466216216216 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 15.0 4.33902439024 346% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2995700006 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233335045158 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949243845644 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487757533726 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161317742878 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538020647697 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.