The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work education and shopping To what extent you do agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education and shopping. To what extent you do agree or disagree?

It is claimed that a decrease in public demand for traveling would be a solution to gridlocks in urban areas. While people can travel on a less regular basis in some ways, I suppose that it is not a pragmatic approach to the problem.

People may resort to a wide range of alternatives to traveling with the advent of advanced technology. Remote working allows employees to undertake tasks in the comfort of their own home, reducing the need to commute to workplaces. Similarly, students can take Internet-based lessons, which proves to be of almost equal quality and efficiency to conventional classes. In the light of the prevalence of e-commerce websites providing innumerable choices of goods, along with shipping services, customers now can do the shopping at the touch of a button. These methods all serve to reduce the need to travel and people no longer struggle with traffic problems such as congestion, time consumption and other relevant issues.

On the other hand, promising as they seem to be, the aforementioned approaches would not be viable from many perspectives. Some people apparently do not gain access to online services for their work, education and businesses due to a lack of electronic devices. Even in case they do, it would not be realistic to expect them to stop leaving their doorsteps as this may compromise their freedom of choice, possibly provoking a public outcry and leading to further social implications. Supposing that daily tasks were limited to online platforms, direct interaction would also decline and cause a feeling of desolation with other psychological impacts. Instead, the traffic issues can be alleviated by focusing on upgrading public transport systems in order to encourage public use and reduce private car ownership.

In conclusion, it is not practical to restrict people from traveling because of many negative impacts so upgrading public transport systems can stand in as a possible remedy to the traffic problems.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-06-25 Kayla 89 view
Essays by user Kayla :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, may, similarly, so, while, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2131661442 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92264906148 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598746081505 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5376905859 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.923076923 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2077477505 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698083808522 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528654425202 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11844591117 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031845905749 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.