Unemployed people in some countries are supplied with weekly amount of money from the governments. Many people assumed that it is a good solution, meanwhile, some think that this activity is pointless. This essay will analyze both sides and give out my view.
It goes without saying that receiving the benefits would have a great impact on these people’s life. Living without a career must be difficult since they almost have no money to pay for their family. For example, these people may suffer from shortage of food, clothes and other fundamental facilities. Finding a job therefore will no longer be their concern if their family suddenly becomes a heavy burden on people’s shoulder. Thanks to the financial supports provided by the governments, it would create an incentive and encouragements for people to continue to look for job. They will also improve their life quality to and comfortably dedicate to their own career.
In contrary, the benefits may bring about some negative effects to unemployed people. The financial supports usually cover whole expenditure of a family on necessary things and payments. Moreover, they are possibly enough for people to have a standard life with furnished house, food and education. As a result, some people may easily lose their motivation to find job opportunities because they are always eligible for such a satisfactory life without any efforts. Many will also depend on unemployment benefits and use it for bad purposes involving committing crimes, namely purchasing alcohol and drugs. The money provided by the governments will be a waste.
To conclude, the benefits is an important payment for unemployed people, however, the authorities should take the amount of money into consideration unless they misuse it.
- The graph below shows the price of bananas in four countries between 1994 and 2004 74
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of having older people living in the family home 79
- In some countries people who are unemployed receive a sum of money each week in the form of a benefit While some support this other people believe that this money should not be given Discuss both points of view and give your own point of view 67
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work education and shopping To what extent you do agree or disagree 89
- Advertising influences people to buy things such as clothes and shoes What are the problems caused by that What solutions can be given 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3109540636 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83257812911 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597173144876 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.894718421 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252483967958 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861645749579 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545769514304 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168474591685 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923718328132 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.