It is true that parents usually try to give everything that their children need in order to bring pleasure to them. In this essay, i will discuss the effects caused by this treatment in children's future life.
Firstly, granting all of children's wishes without considering the impacts to their future life will only cause children to be pampered. In adulthood, children will face many difficulties and have a relationship with many different kinds of people. Sometimes, not all of their wants can be fulfilled, and they have to deal with others to achieve certain goals, which are not focused to themselves. Getting children used to having such habit will only develop bad characteristics for them, such as pampered and noncooperative traits. For the example, when we have grown up and reached our 20s, we have to work in a firm with other employees where we are required to prioritize team's goals more than our own goals.
Secondly, children will have a perception that their parents can always provide their needs, and thus making children become unwilling to strive in their life. This is caused because they are used to rely too much on their parents, that they never struggle to get something they want by themselves. Finally, when they become grown-ups, they will unable to be someone hard-working and strong-willed, like those people who have been succeeded. Consider an example, because their parents always grant children's wishes to cook for them without teaching them how to do it, children will always rely on their parents and until they have been older, they still unable to prepare for their own meals.
In conclusion, giving children anything they want is not something good for children, because it will create bad impacts in their future life.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 67
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph below shows the average monthly temperatures in three major cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... bring pleasure to them. In this essay, i will discuss the effects caused by this...
^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...fficulties and have a relationship with many different kinds of people. Sometimes, not all of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to relying'.
Suggestion: used to relying
...r life. This is caused because they are used to rely too much on their parents, that they ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03754266212 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59495216672 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542662116041 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2283889567 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314421734619 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128281615406 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776835825849 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215232493488 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777973104075 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.