In the past, lectures were used as a way of teaching large numbers of students, but now with the development of technology for education, many people think there is no justification for attending lectures.
A lot of people assume that joining in the lectures is no longer important as this in the past because of the improvement of educational technology. In my opinion, even though people can use technology to gain knowledge instead of going to the lectures, it still need to attend them.
It is irrefutable that when students participate in lectures, they can communicate with each other easily. In terms of "teachers and students", the lecture will tell if the answer is right or wrong and then tell where the student went wrong. Tasks involving reasoning seem to be difficult when studying online. Regarding to the "students and students", when they attend lectures, they can be given a sense of competition to study more from others. It also creates a motivation and happiness for them when connecting with other people.
On the other hand, some people believe that learning online helps students save time and effort. For example: just having a computer or smartphone connected with Internet, students, especially who live in the remote areas and who are busy with the job, can study anytime and anywhere of the day depending on their leisure time. However, in many ways, online lessons have an opposite effect. Some pupils find it vary hard to concentrate on the online speech, maybe they feel difficult to understand because it is not suitable for their level or maybe they will feel discouraged because of not having the connection or they are confused and neglect due to the environment.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that there is no doubt that modern technology has added many new ways to reach education to students, but attending lectures will always play a vital role in the life. In the long term, loining in the direct lessons is a more useful method to gain knowledge than online speech.
- In the past lectures were used as a way of teaching large numbers of students but now with the development of technology for education many people think there is no justification for attending lectures 67
- In the past lectures were used as a way of teaching large numbers of students but now with the development of technology for education many people think there is no justification for attending lectures 67
- An American film actor once said Tomorrow is important and precious Some people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'needs'?
Suggestion: needs
...stead of going to the lectures it still need to attend them It is irrefutable that ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'varies'?
Suggestion: varies
... an opposite effect Some pupils find it vary hard to concentrate on the online speec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, for example, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7845659164 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61203309449 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546623794212 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 311.0 20.2975951904 1532% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1488.0 106.682146367 1395% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 311.0 20.7667163134 1498% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 112.0 7.06120827912 1586% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290776215913 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.290776215913 0.084324248473 345% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180751341407 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567480565429 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 156.6 13.0946893788 1196% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -235.73 50.2224549098 -469% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 123.4 11.3001002004 1092% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.92 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.36 8.58950901804 260% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 9.78957915832 613% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 126.4 10.1190380762 1249% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 157.0 10.7795591182 1456% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.