In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Thanks to cutting-edge technology, society is becoming more and more modern and prosperous, which leads to enhancing people’s life standards in every aspect, particularly in storing documents. In fact, there are a plethora of technological devices that allow people to maintain knowledge instead of saving in books like in the past. From my point of view, I believe that the merits outweigh the drawbacks.
With the support of the Internet, it cannot deny that humans nowadays are brought a myriad of opportunities to get instant access to the relevant information quickly. Look at the date back, if inhabitants had a demand to broaden their horizons, they would have to travel a long distance to local bookstores in order to purchase newspapers and magazines. Needless to say, it obviously might take a great deal of time to commute, as well as costly. In contrast, today's intellectuals are more likely to have access to a wealth of knowledge whenever they need it through the Internet. Furthermore, not only do people time-saving but also does wonders for children who come from lower-income families. In this case, this approach might open up more opportunities for them to engage in online lessons and make progress despite remote areas. For example, in my village, before being connected to the Internet, ethical students did not have the ability to follow a curriculum in local schools due to not having enough budget to afford it.
Nonetheless, although the Internet brings more benefits to improve living conditions, it may have a negative impact on another field that people should consider thoroughly. The first disadvantage springs from many different sources of information. This is because more and more knowledge sprouts across various websites on the Internet, more and more challenging for the authority to conduct rigid screening before publishing. Consequently, readers could be provided fake information, resulting in shaping misunderstanding currents of thought. Another demerit lies in increasing the rate of unemployment. If this trend is continually expanding at a rapid speed, the press no longer requires many human resources in this field. As a result, employees who specialize in publishing books may be taken away jobs, leading to arise of new serious problem for the whole society.
In conclusion, even though storing knowledge on the Internet may have detrimental influences on future careers and information authenticity, I still contend that it is a magical tool to immensely help people in numerous circumstances. Therefore, the government should implement strict supervision before posting on mainstream media.
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart gives information about Someland s main exports in 2000 2005 and 2015 78
- Topic Machines are replacing humans in the manual workforce Do you think the positive effects outweigh the negative effects 89
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 89
- Topic It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to providing formal education To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ly. The first disadvantage springs from many different sources of information. This is because...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2241.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05170424914 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628915662651 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5338169709 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.947368421 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47368421053 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217782668782 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540415406364 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634867747239 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140279236655 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581374816117 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.