People aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives. But few people achieve it. What are the causes of problems? How to overcome it?
In the contemporary world, the pursuit of work-life balance is a common aspiration, yet it remains a challenging goal for many. This essay explores the reasons behind this phenomenon and proposes practical solutions to address the work-life balance problem.
There are two primary reasons why individuals find it challenging to achieve a balance between their work and personal lives. Firstly, due to the competitive employment market, the scarcity of job opportunities compels people to dedicate more time to their jobs to secure their positions. Moreover, the relentless pursuit of professional success often leads individuals to prioritize their career advancement over nurturing family and friend relationships. Additionally, the ubiquitous presence of mobile phones and their applications provides a convenient gateway to work-related tasks, inadvertently immersing individuals in a virtual world and further disconnecting them from their family members.
Given the previously mentioned causes, several measures can be taken to alleviate the work-life balance problem. First and foremost, it is essential for individuals to allocate equal time per day for work and personal life, crafting a well-structured schedule that allows them to manage and distribute their efforts across various activities. Additionally, reducing the time spent on mobile phones and investing it in meaningful conversations with parents and loved ones fosters a deeper connection and maintains family ties. Embracing hobbies and engaging in activities that contribute to their well-being will enable individuals to nurture their physical and mental health, resulting in a more balanced and fulfilling life.
In conclusion, achieving work-life balance is a complex endeavor, driven by various factors in the contemporary world. However, by adopting proactive measures, such as establishing structured schedules and prioritizing personal connections, individuals can attain harmony between
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | viviannguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 84
- More and more measures to improve the security in large urban areas have been introduced in many countries because of the increased crime Do the benefits of these measure outweigh the drawbacks 78
- The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011 73
- The table below shows the consumption of three basic foods rice wheat and maize by people in four different countries 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'achieving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: achieving
...ons why individuals find it challenging to achieve a balance between their work and person...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04642857143 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22097518191 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7933906258 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.083333333 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219348574665 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821718652545 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578950386122 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12898690966 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390142708005 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.11 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.21 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.