People are becoming too dependent on the Internet and phones. Is it a positive or negative development?
The blooming age of Industrial 4.0 is now turning many a person into hinging on the Internet and mobile phones. This essay is aimed at considering this issue thoroughly prior to arriving at a firm conclusion.
There are a number of different benefits to be taken into account when it comes to people becoming addicted to the Internet and telephones. To begin with, the issue might result in cell phones coming to necessaries nowadays. By and large, they can not step away from these requisites on the grounds that there are a large number of fabulous and beneficial apps on smartphones and informative websites which hold exciting fascinations with users like e-newspapers, e-learning sites, e-commerce exchange, to name but a few, to aid effectively their daily work. Also, the fact that people take advantage of the Internet and cellular phones in some particular circumstance deserves consideration. In the nationwide lockdown and social distancing period to avert the Coivid-19 pandemic, every single national from students to white-collar workers converted most real-world activities into virtual forms with the aid of the Internet and a lot of profitable apps, with the result that people cannot be irresistible to spend more and more time on the Internet and their phones.
It is likewise worth mentioning several drawbacks of this issue. Granted that in respect of examination in education, devices, including smartphones, smart watches, connected to the Internet could facilitate cheating in exams, this problematic challenge violates and ruins the equity and morality in candidates’ performance assessment. Another major demerit is their damages to users’ health in medical term. Given the fact that social network abuse to conduct cyberbullying into an individual account comes from not only Facebook’s users but also other platform’s ones, the victim suffers severe depression, mental problems in general which could lead to his pitiful suicide.
In view of the aforementioned discussion, I take the position that people relying on the Internet and phones too much can be a mixed blessing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...equisites on the grounds that there are a large number of fabulous and beneficial apps on smartph...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, so, in general, by and large, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42727272727 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98080944997 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.793431338 49.4020404114 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 149.25 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186956187509 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683235838843 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084891054593 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121589152527 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105529950446 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.