Some people think that technology is now an invaluable study tool for young people. Others, however, believe that it is harmful for the studying process. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many a person hold the opinion that technology takes negative effects on youngsters’ studying process now. Nonetheless, this is contradicted by other people, myself included, who espouse the notion that technology has been positively impacting on their learning. These two opposing perspectives will be clarified below.
On the one hand, there are a number of different explanations to be taken into account as to why it is detrimental to students to depend on technology to support their study now. For one thing, this might result in learners becoming more and more passive in their learning. By and large, students are not encouraged to memorize and apply what they were taught at school on the grounds that they are totally able to search everything to do their assignments on the Internet within a few minutes. For another, the fact that there is a large number of harmful information sources on the Internet relating sex, racial discrimination, fake news and violence deserves consideration. A lot of youngsters easily access them to indulge their curiosity without an effective method of protection from adults, with the result that they usually tend to have acts of violence and misbehaviours nowadays.
On the other hand, it is my contention that technology is a supportive tool for teenagers for several reasons. To begin with, granted that thanks to technology, all of the human knowledge is collected and published in public for education and scientific research of the community, students can search a large deal of valuable knowledge to serve their learning. Another important factor for this is students can take full advantage of technology to get online learning instead of offline one in cases of pandemics, natural disasters. Given the fact that there are more opportunities for students to keep learning without being limited by any obstacles like weather and distance, general and higher education are capable of delivering to students in remote areas.
In conclusion, I take the position that while to some extent technology has its shortcomings, it is also an indispensable tool to support students’ learning for the reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 531, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...es. For another, the fact that there is a large number of harmful information sources on the Inte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ith, granted that thanks to technology, all of the human knowledge is collected and publis...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nonetheless, so, while, as to, in conclusion, by and large, for one thing, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27089337176 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97233434983 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579250720461 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9443933556 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.692307692 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6923076923 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190990033587 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719368048545 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633879577468 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12114999718 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196159190264 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.