. People are encouraged to get rid of things in order to get newest fashion and latest technologies.
Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh the economic advantages
In the modern world, many people are willing to follow new trends and fashion. In this reason, they are keen to throw away old things such as technologies, clothes and accessories, in order to buy new ones. However, these consumer behaviour can lead to fatal consequences.
First of all, producing a plethora of disposable things can pollute the surrounding world. That is to say, individuals can damage to the environment, if they continue their habits of purchasing things for single-use. A good illustration of this is pollution, because many resources and materials, such as marine and natural resources, are contaminated, because of disposal things. Secondly, modern people should economize things in order to utilize them efficiently and save their funds. It is widely accepted that if people use things more productively, they can spend their money to purchase other things. For example, they can buy accommodation or private cars, if they do not spend their money to purchase new clothes and technologies.
On the other hand, throwaway society can expand manufacturers’ production and business. Therefore, this can develop companies, and lead economy of the country to the prosperous. For example, if consumers start to buy new things, instead of using old ones, this gives an opportunity for companies to produce more goods and services. Furthermore, such kind of behaviour can motivate people to earn more money, behaviour if they notice new items from other people, they can intend to purchase these goods as soon as possible, and this desire can motivate them to earn. For example, when famous American company Apple introduces their new gadget, such as iPhone and MacBook, many people intend to buy these items, and they work hard in order to afford this mobile phone.
To conclude, although many people reckon that throwaway society can be useful for the economy, others feel that this kind of habit can lead to overuse of resources and materials, which is negatively influenced on natural resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-16 | uwwysgdb | 11 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | uwwysgdb | 11 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | Sahil_bains776 | 11 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | Sahil_bains776 | 11 | view |
| 2020-04-29 | kandarajan | 76 | view |
- Some people say that modern innovations bring a lot more problems than benefits Do you agree or disagree 51
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- People are encouraged to get rid of things in order to get newest fashion and latest technologies Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh the economic advantages 76
- One of the most important issues faving the world today is a shortage of food and some think genetically modified foods are a possible solution To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- In many countries the government likes to spend more money on the arts some people agree with this however other think government should spend more on health and education discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this consumer' or 'these consumers'?
Suggestion: this consumer; these consumers
...ies, in order to buy new ones. However, these consumer behaviour can lead to fatal consequence...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23384615385 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82374379045 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5046491968 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.4 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0976815216225 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435752592335 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390948022923 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716466051338 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172995782852 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.