People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Concerning the issue of the fact that people in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays, some people do support this matter because of its benefits. However, others have opposite ideas. In this writing, both sides of this debate will be analyzed before reaching any conclusions.
From the one side, a plausible argument of supporters is that buying low-priced products will bring many benefits to consumers in many aspects. First of all, it can be said with certainty that cheap products can help consumers save the money, which means that they can buy more other things. This is surely a positive feature because for example, students who can't afford a brand-new motorbike with a full price can buy a second-hand one with a half price. It helps them to save money to pay for other things such as tuition fee and other living fee such as renting house, water bill and so on. Last but not least, it is believed that low-priced products mean that they are sold everywhere, which makes them easy to be found. This is undoubtedly positive since we can find cheap shoes anywhere in this crowded city: in the market, in the supermarket, or even on the side walk of a busy street. However, expensive shoes from a famous brand like Gucci or Adidas are much harder to be found. We have to buy it in-store, in online shop, which is not only time-consuming but also really costly.
From the other side, those who disagree point out that there are a couple of shortcomings. Firstly, one of the disadvantages is that almost every low-priced products will probably have poor quality. This is a clear limitation because for instance, items which is from China usually extremely cheap but they can neither work well nor durable, which is not only can't help you save money but also money-wasting. A further handicap may be that many consumers have to face the problem of being scammed when buy cheap products. This is obviously negative because nowadays, there are many scammers using the identity of online sellers to do their crime. They often sell items at extremely low prices. After paying, the consumers will not receive the items as expected. Finally, many people oppose this viewpoint because if the goods' prices are so cheap, people likely to buy many unnecessary things, which leads to the lack of money for other essential thing. This problem can be easily caught in many students' life where internet and other kind of online shopping is so popular and easy to find.
Taking everything into account, for the above reasons, I firmly believe that the limitations of buying cheap products outweigh its possible benefits. Therefore, I do totally reject the consuming low-priced products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Concerning the issue of the fact that pe...
^^
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ature because for example, students who cant afford a brand-new motorbike with a ful...
^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ork well nor durable, which is not only cant help you save money but also money-wast...
^^^^
Line 3, column 996, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...is problem can be easily caught in many students life where internet and other kind of o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 457.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88402625821 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51619825946 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527352297593 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8804960533 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.454545455 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7727272727 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20583941904 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593485450005 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806497752886 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150663725661 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492220430505 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.