People have different views on how to reduce traffic congestion. Some think that governments should build more train and subway lines, while others think that building more roads and widening existing roads will reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
When the issue of solutions to traffic jams come into view, there exist conflicting opinions. Some people hold the notion that authorities should invest more money in public transportation; meanwhile, others claim that existing roads should be widened and more roads should be constructed. This essay will discuss both solutions before giving my opinion.
On the one hand, public transport systems have a wide range of pros and cons. In terms of its benefits, public transports are convenient for mankind. In other words, when traveling by bus or train, people do not have to worry about parking lots, while car parking in big cities is extrememly restricted. Moreover, the mass transit is also proven to solve traffic congestion effectively, especially during rush hours. Take Hanoi as an illustration. Before the metro contruction, the city was always stuck with traffic; however, thanks to this new means of public transport, the proportion of traffic congestion in this town has been recorded to have halved the past figure. What can be inferred from this example is that public transport is essential to sloving traffic issues. However, the biggest drawback of this measurement is its cleanliness. Many people do not want to travel by bus because metro systems and trains are often dirty and crowded.
On the other hand, reconstructing roads has many advantages and disadvantages. The strength point of widening more roads is to lower the rate of traffic congestion due to more lanes for cars. Despite this advantage, its drawbacks should not be ignored. Increasing roadways encourages more people to drive, thus failing to improve congestion. To be more specific, when new roads are opened, it temporarily increases the supply of road spaces and decreases traffic. Nevertheless, in the long-term period, people get back in their cars, which leads to congestion returning to the same level as before and sometimes worse. China serves as a perfect example of this problem. Due to an increase in the number of vehicles on roads, the Chinese government has allowed building of more roads, and at the same time, enhancing the existing ones. However, this problem has not been solved, but the number of traffic jams is recorded to rise.
In conclusion, the investment in public transport and the construction of new roads have their own benefits and drawbacks. From my point of view, the governments and authorities should join hands to slove this issue by spending more money on public transport systems due to their great benefits to humans.
- The diagram below show how oil is extracted in the production of perfume Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 87
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- People have different views on how to reduce traffic congestion Some think that governments should build more train and subway lines while others think that building more roads and widening existing roads will reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15217391304 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7509998946 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538647342995 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2050597788 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7391304348 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91304347826 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320010760086 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789935227395 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680058911168 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198118670717 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814624166695 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.