People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world?
Over the past decades, environmental issues have never failed to draw public attention and provoke debates. People now have a lack of knowledge about the natural world’s role. While there are a rich variety of reasons to explain this problem, there are ways in which people can improve their understanding.
It is widely accepted that there are two main reasons why people don’t have a good grasp of the values of nature. Firstly, people now are extremely occupied with their careers and hobbies, resulting in a significant increase in the amount of time they spend for themselves. Instead of learning information about the natural world in their free time, going to the gym or eating at a restaurant with friends might be people’s priorities. Secondly, many traditional festivals related to nature have fallen gradually. For instance, some celebrations derived from the farmers’ hopes for an abundant crop were disappeared, causing the lack of connections between people and nature.
However, people can broaden their knowledge about the natural world in various ways. By focusing on advances in technology, people can approach a source of information on the Internet by themselves, hence improving their awareness of environmental issues and encouraging them to take action on natural problems. Besides, governments should impose more legislations on offenders who degrade nature, and this will educate people about the importance of global protection.
In conclusion, compared to those who lived in the last decades, young people these days don’t have enough knowledge about the natural world. However, there are many ways that people can overcome this lack of understanding.
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world? 61
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world? 61
- Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn, while others believe that more effective way is through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- More and more people buy a wide range of household goods like television microwave oven and rice cooker Do you think this is positive or negative development 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49809885932 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94401195777 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596958174905 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8228007985 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45812488614 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166912029874 0.084324248473 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896859911023 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297232278198 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188569503751 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.