With an increase in life expectancy, human cloning has emerged as an important source of spare organs. Many people are terrified by this happening in reality. While I do have few concerns, in my opinion, it is largely a positive development.
Those who are worried by this practice becoming rampant have numerous reasons. To begin with, they consider is highly undignified to manipulate human genes and create a desirable living product in a laboratory. Another worrying aspect of cloning a human is that it is religiously unethical. It is viewed as blasphemous and an attempt to take God's work in human hand.
However, I strongly believe that if we find a way to solve this moral crisis, cloning can prove revolutionary for the survival of human race on this planet. Firstly, it can improve the quality of life for many disabled as well as diseased individuals. For instance, many people have to suffer amputation of foot or lower limb due to infection in diabetics but with human cloning, these limbs can be replaced with healthier ones. Similarly, new organs can be produced for people with disabilities. Secondly, as we know climate change is increasingly making environmental conditions hostile for survival of mankind, we can choose healthier genes to pass on to future generations and clone more-fitting and stronger individuals. Moreover, it can make humans invincible to many pathogens and disease causing organisms.
To sum it up, while human cloning has become a potential reality now, its moral aspects are still controversial. However, I am of the opinion that if grievances of people are addressed carefully, cloning can become a powerful tool to ensure sustainability of a healthier human race on earth.
- The diagram below shows how the water cycle works. 56
- As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction. 61
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 84
- The diagram shows how tea leaves are processed into five tea types. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.128113879 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00580526869 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597864768683 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2794642334 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127390732061 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473851148095 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284685560139 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872340553893 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190831926751 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.