People should focus more on solving problems related to the future, and should not spend time thinking about the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Essay topics:

People should focus more on solving problems related to the future, and should not spend time thinking about the past.

To what extent do you agree or disagree.

It is true that, people are more conscious about future and try to solve forthcoming problems rather understand the yesterdays issues. However, in this essay disagree with the statement because, people who often thinking about future certainly learn the lessons from past to the core. At once, these two actions become co related.

Experience makes men perfect. Such as, people who willing to do risk on future or having a solution for many problems often by the result of past experience. Upcoming problems helps everybody to focus on tomorrow and take preventive measures to mitigate catastrophes that happened previously. In fact, people who fail to concentrate on past issues may not have had a strength or courage to focus on inhibiting future problems in some extent. For instance, extreme grave effects of landslides in Kerala makes government to legislate over excessive soil erosion and stone eruption in mountains by the learning from past.

Similarly, people who argued to spend time for future inhibiting the exact value of past things and describe it as past is past. However, excessive thinking of future facts may reduce the value of today and tomorrow. Over imagination and coming matters would always limits the real value of on going days and which may lead to stress and tension related issues. For instance, many youngsters are under treatment of stress related health problems in city of London, by the target achieving without thinks about past success. Moreover, future issues and problems might solve by the healthy body and mind irrespective of excessive blood pressure and other diseases.

To conclude, thinking about future is indispensable though, learned lessons from past experience would gave the ability to solve and fulfill needs. Thereby, avoiding past would not be a better choice than spending time for following years to found solutions or avoiding problems.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-20 eyraen 73 view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...or many problems often by the result of past experience. Upcoming problems helps everybody to f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'limit'
Suggestion: limit
...ination and coming matters would always limits the real value of on going days and whi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...s would always limits the real value of on going days and which may lead to stress and t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...ispensable though, learned lessons from past experience would gave the ability to solve and ful...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...rned lessons from past experience would gave the ability to solve and fulfill needs....
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, moreover, similarly, so, for instance, in fact, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26644736842 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58877817133 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582236842105 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4008460146 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259141359081 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833000047552 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056279976589 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158385274368 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166024783059 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.