scientists predict that humans will speak the same language in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Communication gap or language barrier has been a adventurous path to many innovative movement. Scientist believe that would be solute in over coming years by using common language. In this essay reckon that would be a positive development for trade, education, medical, technology, finance, tourism and so on.
To begin with, communication barrier have had an infinite criteria to be solved. Humans are suffering language problem to express own feelings, share ideas, and explain actual situation. If people using common language as a media would be an enthusiastic steps for the future. Consequently, improve commercial status by explain real virtue of things had sold, students could understand the lessons, patients might explain their feelings actually felt as well. In addition local people may explain the tourist about the existence and there by flourish the nations financial status and to reduce the unrealistic problems such as tricks and cheat for instance.
Conversely, ample spread of same language would inhibit local languages, culture and celebrations. However, such changes may overcome by some other ways like, celebrate national holidays as globally, exchange ideas and enjoy every cultures without an ignorance and fear. Moreover, different language may subside wars by speaking the real situations have had. For example, instruments cannot substitute for words because most of the conflicts occur between races by the words they spoke could not understand each other.
To conclude, local languages may protect many ancient compositions, nevertheless speaking same language globally may enhance the peoples behaviour and nation trends. At once positive development is decrease the negative changes as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | nhung3012 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-08 | Albert Armin | 89 | view |
- Many claim that the fast food industry had a negative effect on the environment eating habits and families To what extend do you agree or disagree 67
- The maps below describe an area before and after the construction of a hydroelectric power plant Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Many people think that museums will be replaced by technology as most information can be found free online Others believe that museums are still important Will museums no longer be needed in the future Is this a positive development 62
- In today’s world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot? 78
- In the past people wore their traditional clothes and followed their culture These days most people wear similar clothes and therefore look very similar to one another Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cation gap or language barrier has been a adventurous path to many innovative mov...
^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
... to many innovative movement. Scientist believe that would be solute in over coming yea...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Scientist) must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
... to many innovative movement. Scientist believe that would be solute in over coming yea...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would be solute in over coming years by using common language. In this essay rec...
^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...munication barrier have had an infinite criteria to be solved. Humans are suffering lang...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
...ion. If people using common language as a media would be an enthusiastic steps for the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'step'?
Suggestion: step
...age as a media would be an enthusiastic steps for the future. Consequently, improve c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...heir feelings actually felt as well. In addition local people may explain the tourist ab...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... same language globally may enhance the peoples behaviour and nation trends. At once po...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, conversely, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73180076628 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79962081707 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674329501916 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6631291015 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163779278504 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057296951831 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519229620225 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105885390262 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599319000332 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.