In today’s society, there is a growing trend towards extended working hours, which can . have an adverse impact on individuals, their families and community. Therefore, it is essential to impose limitations on working hours. I totally agree with this point of view.. To begin with, spending more time at work can indeed have a detrimental impact on workers' health and work performance. This is because extended hours of work can lead to both physical and mental fatigue. As a consequence, individuals may find it challenging to maintain high levels of concentration on their tasks, increasing the likelihood of errors and mistakes. For instance, according to a survey, individuals working more than 10 hours per day often take longer to complete tasks that would typically be accomplished more quickly and accurately during regular working hours. Consequently, prolonged hours at work can significantly decrease work productivity.
Moreover, extended working hours can have a severe effect on workers’ families and societies. At the family level, spending more time at work means that individuals have less opportunities for meaningful conversations and shared experiences with their family members. This can lead to a decline in the quality of family interactions and bonding. In terms of the society level, overworking workers have less time engaging in social and community activities, leading to social isolation and reduced community engagement. Therefore, it should be better for workers to limit their working hours and to have a work-life balance.
In conclusion, longer working hours can pose detrimental effects on individuals’ life in terms of their health and their work productivity or even lead to isolation in the society as a whole, thereby limitations on extended working hours should be imposed. I am also convinced that once such measures are made, there will be more people having a work-life balance, creating a healthy community.
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and society so working hours should be restricted Do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 56
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...owards extended working hours, which can . have an adverse impact on individuals, ...
^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Have
...rds extended working hours, which can . have an adverse impact on individuals, their...
^^^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... I totally agree with this point of view.. To begin with, spending more time at wo...
^^
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...can indeed have a detrimental impact on workers health and work performance. This is be...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 527, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maintaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: maintaining
...ce, individuals may find it challenging to maintain high levels of concentration on their t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 933, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnificantly decrease work productivity. Moreover, extended working hours can hav...
^^^
Line 2, column 171, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun opportunities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ime at work means that individuals have less opportunities for meaningful conversati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45065789474 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05895489545 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532894736842 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7802950841 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40017260608 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150152977163 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116435738977 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321041960551 0.151304729494 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506400140518 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.