People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the removal of old building has become a fiercely controversial issue. Some people assert that old buildings should be replaced with new buildings, while others argue that people should preserve old buildings. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that human beings should have the right to keep old facilities. Perhaps an obvious disadvantage of getting rid of these facilities is that a multitude of old amenities are playing an important role in the field of tourism industry. As an illustration, one recent study conducted by the Seoul National University analyzed that the reason why foreigners foreingers visit South Korea and it turned out that the main reason is traditional Korean korean buildings. In addition, some of these buildings allow pupils to learn about their history, which exerts positive influences on educating them. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for several of the arguments in favour of keeping old buildings.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that old amenities merely bring with positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that new facilities often contribute to an increase in citizen's life satisfcation. To exemplify, one notable traditional palace in China was converted into a national museum and according to one article released by the Beijing Times, about 60% of local residents were satisfied with this change. Furthermore, constructing new buildings make it possible for the government to boost economy since it creats a multitude of employment opportunities related to the construction. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
- QQQQQQQQQQQ2 Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagr 89
- Q6 Some people prefer to have temporary jobs which means that they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of time to do what they want What is your opinion 89
- QQ6 Some people prefer to have temporary jobs which means they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of the time to do what they want What is your opinion 84
- Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Korean
...out that the main reason is traditional Korean korean buildings. In addition, some of these b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3313253012 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94247356403 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605421686747 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1904386502 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178633626576 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561450406082 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735063055944 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107410528169 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996656486761 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.