Over the last few decades, there has been an increase in international tourism. Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the issue of whether tourism is advantageous has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that global tourism exerts positive influences on local society, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of benefits that can be derived from an increase in tourism. Perhaps the principal advantage is that tourism boosts the economy considering that it attracts investment from governments and global companies. Another benefit is that tourism creates employment opportunities in the building of facilities and the updating of infrastructure. To provide a hypothetical example, if it were not for tourism, there would be higher unemployment rates in a myriad of well-known cities amongst tourists since most of their economies rely on tourists’ spending. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for several of the arguments in favour of tourism.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that global tourism merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that a multitude of travellers do harm to the local environment. To exemplify, one renowned natural habitat in South Korea had a multitude of bird species. However, nearly 70% of them are extinct and it turns out that a great deal of waste produced by tourists is the main reason of this phenomenon. In addition, the majority of European countries’ economies revolve around the tertiary industry, which causes some inhabitants who worked in the field of the primary industry sector to have difficulty in adapting to changes resulting from the rising number of tourists. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-30 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
- Q9 A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Wh 84
- Q4 Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Q Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what exatent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...to communicate in a language other than ones mother tongue can make it difficult for...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...above, I also find these persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that there...
^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20114942529 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81467240787 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7403947596 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244425624654 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718259349561 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066825475378 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12655442537 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521674623404 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.