People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the preservation of old facilities has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that old buildings should be replaced with new buildings, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from the removal of old amenities. Perhaps the principal advantage is that protecting and managing old buildings place a heavy burden on citizens in general. To provide a hypothetical example, If it were not for old facilities, the government could save a huge amount of money considering that vast sums of public funds are needed to maintain obsolete buildings. Another benefit is that constructing new facilities creates a large number of employment opportunities given that a huge number of employees are required in the building industry. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for the replacement of obsolete facilities to modern buildings.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that changing old buildings to new buildings should be required. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that a myriad of outdated buildings are useful to educate pupils. To be more specific, allowing teenagers to visit traditional attractions help them to reap a myriad of invaluable lessons and even feel a sense of belonging to our society. In addition, keeping old buildings can lead to a boom in tourism given that numerous historical attractions can attract travellers, which makes it possible not only for people who are engaged in the tourism industry to live a better life but also for cities to invigorate economic growth. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-24 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | minhquanvn | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | Nguyễn Tấn Anh | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | xinyu961121 | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | xinyu961121 | 80 | view |
- Q1 Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city centre with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Q Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- QQ9 With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 89
- Q Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Q2 Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hat constructing new facilities creates a large number of employment opportunities given that a h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...above, I also find these persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that there...
^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1547277937 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91864157609 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575931232092 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9899544561 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4375 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223476753326 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070495403853 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066859283231 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126242277217 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647535930505 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.