People who have original ideas are of much greater value to society than those who are simply able to copy the ideas of others. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
To emerge excellent creativity is not a cup of tea for everyone. Presently, the owners of unprecedent ideas are supposed to be worthwhile for community as compared to those who follow the path shown by superior thinkers. Here, I would like to Accord with the given statement firmly.
Numerous points can be considered to shore up the former view. First and foremos, people to whom God blessed with exceptional ideas are expert to execute this idea in an efficient manner rather than those who duplicate the ideas of others. Consequently, genuine ideology is beyond compare. Moreover, inventors of innovative ideas are likely to be have more influence on civilians to simulate them towards their ideas which are better for the mankind as compared to people who copy others. Thence, the thinkers of creative ideas are considered to be more valuable to society instead of others who have the tendency to imitate others.
Further emphasize on my point of view. Initially, human beings who have calibre to introduce innovative ideas are well experienced as they deeply connected to the results which they produced after being more concentrate on the work for plenty of years. Beside this, they attain admiration from civilians as they burn midnight oil to yield exceptional ideas. As a result, comparison of people who have original Idea with copier people is matchless as creative thinkers are of much greater value to society.
To recapitulate, both the sides have their own valid ground. However, I still believe that people with the exceptional values are an assets of a nation as they put there dedications to emerge original ideas for the betterment of society.
- Many people try to find a balance between their work and other aspects of their life However few actually achieve this What solution can you suggest 73
- In some countries people who are unemployed receive a sum of money each week in the form of a benefit While some support this other people believe that this money should not be given Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Nowadays culture of different countries are becoming more similar then they used to be What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative development give your own opinion and examples 79
- In countries like Japan the population is getting older are the effects of aging population on society is a negative or positive Discuss both views and give your opinion 11
- In countries like Japan the population is getting older are the effects of aging population on society is a negative or positive Discuss both views and give your opinion 51
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient manner" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...l ideas are expert to execute this idea in an efficient manner rather than those who duplicate the ide...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...have the tendency to imitate others. Further emphasize on my point of view. Initiall...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an asset' or simply 'assets'?
Suggestion: an asset; assets
... people with the exceptional values are an assets of a nation as they put there dedicatio...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, moreover, so, still, then, well, while, as for, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10218978102 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68889694193 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576642335766 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.165282153 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349110120736 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107882695476 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111534923043 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19789917789 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680946006519 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.