personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one's career. To what extend do you agree or disargee
Many people focus on personal development to progres their profession and advance in their career. Personally, I entirely agree with this trend.
There are a number arguments in favour of my stance.
Fossily, it self - improvement skills can lead to the better quality of your viewpoint. A strategic vision would male appropriate decisions throughout many difficulties cases encounted at the work place , which results in remarkable working performance. For example, an outstanding tactic will contribute huge value for the business in the global econemic downturn. Another point worth noting is that personal developments will pave a way for enhancing the posibility of promotion. An excellent individual with many experences can easily promote to higher position with many opportuntes in his career.
In the case someone doesn't improve his self - developments, he will encounter to numerous challenges and intricacies in his job.
Firstly people can't gain their commanding power in their workplace.
If a person has a high office but he dosen't has a great self - skill to contribute and manage his lower colleagues, the others will easily affront him and this lead to the individual working of members in that firm, which results in the low effects of the business and more secretly, the bankrupt of the coorperation. Last but not least, someone who has not made significar strides in enhancing themselves would be isolated from others, which correlates with staff member being depresed on quiting his job.
In conclusion, with the arguments outlined above, we can see the immortant role of personal development skills in professional growth and achieving success in one's life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-03 | roadtoapro | 89 | view |
- The diagram below shows the amount of pork and chicken consumed in the US between 1960 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagrams below show the results of a survey from Taiwan explaining how students wanting to study overseas chose a university from 1998 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 67
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: IT_SELF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'itself'?
Suggestion: itself
...ments in favour of my stance. Fossily, it self - improvement skills can lead to the be...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ulties cases encounted at the work place , which results in remarkable working per...
^^
Line 4, column 21, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...es in his career. In the case someone doesnt improve his self - developments, he wil...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...intricacies in his job. Firstly people cant gain their commanding power in their wo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ssional growth and achieving success in ones life.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37121212121 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93190521106 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632575757576 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9906948532 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152193794523 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540614942134 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715661615517 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702304301599 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817623729513 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.