The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007.

Given in the graph is the illustration of how much people use the Toronto Metro system for transit, recorded for a week over the time in question.
Overall, what is striking from the graph is that the quantity of passengers followed the same pattern, fluctuating significantly throughout the timeframe.
As can be seen, Toronto Metro system activity started at 100 thousand users at 6 in the morning, and then 2 hours later, the number of passengers peaked at 400 thousand, which is recorded as the highest of all time. Subsequently, the figure considerably dropped to 200 thousand users at 10 a.m. Remarkably, there was also a similar trend after that time, more specifically, the total 100 thousand users at 4 in the evening jumped to just under 400 thousand users after 2 hours, but this was followed by a dramatic decline to only about 150 thousand users.
Moreover, since 10 a.m, the volume of passengers saw a steady increase to 300 thousand people, after which the number suddenly went down to only 100 thousand at 4 in the evening, the same as that at 6 a.m. Eventually, there was a slight fluctuation between 150 and 200 thousand passengers from 8 to 10 in the evening.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-26 roadtoapro 73 view
2023-06-26 roadtoapro 73 view
2019-08-08 nguyenthao2806 67 view
2019-05-03 rajveerbooh2000@gmail.com 56 view
2019-05-03 rajveerbooh2000@gmail.com 11 view
Essays by user roadtoapro :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...in the graph is the illustration of how much people use the Toronto Metro system for...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7756097561 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79003069286 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.5217982909 43.030603864 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 195.8 112.824112599 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.0 22.9334400587 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15022553178 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10257488954 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783816336348 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111051761655 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710857855475 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.2329268293 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.