a person's worth is now a days seem to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old fashioned values such as honor, kindness and trust no longer seem important. Agree or Disagree?
Currently, some people think that social status and material possessions play an important role in appreciating a person's worth. While I accept that those help people be respected, I would argue that many other factors are much more crucial.
There are some reasons why people can be judged by social status and material possessions. Firstly, since, nowadays, people always strike for earning money, which can make them be stressed and depressed, they can be attracted by wealthy people. As a result, they believe that material possessions is the best way to perform them. For example, when I see a youngster driving a modern car like BMW, I immediately admire him and wish I were him. Secondly, people having high social position have wider relationship which is a key to succeed in career, so they are highly regarded and become a role of model for other people.
However, it seems to me that judging people should accord to their personalities. The first one is that these days, people are less concerned and help each other than in the past, so kindness is a value personality to appreciate a person. For instant, in Vietnam many young people usually spend their time on repairing or painting the poor's houses, which makes them be loved and respected. In addition, a person is likely to be highly appreciated and make friends, if they lie one's way into their goal. This can cause that they lose the trust of people surrounding him.
In conclusion, I recognise that appreciating a person can accord to social status and material possessions, but I believe that their personality is a best way to understand a person.
- The chart below shows the rate of males and females who were overweight in Austalia from 1980 to 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant. 56
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 74
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at leas 67
- The decisions that people make quickly are always wrong. Do you agree or disagree with thí statement. 56
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e for earning money, which can make them be stressed and depressed, they can be a...
^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...MW, I immediately admire him and wish I were him. Secondly, people having high socia...
^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...preciated and make friends, if they lie ones way into their goal. This can cause tha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...but I believe that their personality is a best way to understand a person.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90217391304 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6969448163 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572463768116 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4725721702 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.076923077 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191120597023 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078757743824 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705682011839 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134676033092 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409331207158 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.