The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
Social media and virtual communication have been blamed for progressively drifting people apart. In my opinion, this problem can be attributed to various reasons which are going to be elaborated in this essay
On the one hand, it is inevitable that the benefits brought by the Internet are tremendous, however, adversely affects face-to-face communication. Because, nowadays, people can meet anyone they love just by a click as long as they get access to the Internet. This convenience, nonetheless, reduces people’s demand to see other people directly as they can still gossip, discuss or see anyone without necessarily leaving their houses. For instance, Facebook allows its users to call and see other people at the same time through the feature called face-time
On the other hand, social networking offers people greater opportunities to make more friends as it contains numerous people’s profiles on it. Specifically, it is impossible to know one’s habit or hometown just by the first time greeting. However, as most social media users update their profiles or status frequently on this kind of platform, people can certainly get basic information of most any individual before adding them to their friend lists. Therefore, high chances that they also find more people that are in common with them, which totally overshadow the conventional communication, leading people to move away from starting new relationships on the spot
To conclude, it is true that social networking or communication through screen have definitely been the norm in our society. Nevertheless, this phenomenon can take its toll on people’s traditional means of communication due to the various advantages it gives the Internet users
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-21 | linhdk35 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | Kaito Mori | view | |
| 2022-08-17 | dorae | view | |
| 2022-04-27 | bigbadmonster | view | |
| 2022-04-26 | bigbadmonster | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 78
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Open plan office no walls no barriers Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph below shows the information about medical care in three Europe countries between 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The diagram illustrates how plastic bottles are recycled Overall the recycling of 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, for instance, kind of, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41635687732 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00791509854 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60594795539 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.0182116396 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.888888889 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8888888889 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.3333333333 7.06120827912 231% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0171540268311 0.244688304435 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00637302100005 0.084324248473 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0123866061437 0.0667982634062 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00868903387231 0.151304729494 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00961306055961 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.