The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pictures illustrate the transformation of a coastal village as it was in 1995 and the current layout of it
Overall, there have been noticeable shifts in the residential area with the increases in accommodation. This village has also been urbanized with the introduction of sports facilities replacing green areas
In 1995, to the south of the map where the sea is, there was previously a fishing industry, with a fishing port and quite a large fish market as well. Next to this was a small café. On the other side of the west-east road, stood a line of shops and a hotel, while situated in the northeast part of the village was farmland and a forest a park adjacent to each other. The main housing was located in the northwest alongside the main road that runs from the coastal road, with four houses encircled by a smaller side-street
Turning to the present day map, it is apparent that the fishing amenities have all gone, being replaced by four apartments, and the shops have been demolished to make way for restaurants. The café remained intact, so does the hotel, albeit with an addition of a car park. Moreover, a new golf course and tennis courts were erected on the original site of the farmland and the forest park. Although the old houses have stayed unchanged, new ones have been built, along with a new road with two new houses beside it
- The graphs below show the post school qualifications held by Canadians in the age groups 25 to 35 and 45 to 55 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 54
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980s and 2010s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 73
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map shows the development of the village 73
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sports facilities replacing green areas In 1995, to the south of the map where t...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 522, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ouses encircled by a smaller side-street Turning to the present day map, it is ap...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a new road with two new houses beside it
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69008264463 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58512938322 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561983471074 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.4708725214 43.030603864 222% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.875 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.25 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0840421846875 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312816685189 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03602371372 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538407473386 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250890127844 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.