The plans below show the South Wing of Walton Museum in 2008 and in 2012.
The given pictures give information about the appearance of the floor plan of Walton Museum between 2008 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the South Wing of Walton Museum had experienced considerable changes during the period shown. The most noticeable differences between the two maps are the upgradation of the entrance and the expansion of the floor plan.
As can be seen from the plans, the shop, which was located in the middle of the first floor, overcame no changes over the given period, and the same was occurred with the gallery nearby. During the same period, the reception above became was narrowed and also added with the function cloacking, while a restaurant was constructed on the higher floor. To the northwest of the shop, the entrance outdoor was upgraded into the entrance hall with two terraces built above.
Turning to other features on the eastern and northeastern side, the stairs was demolished and expanded to make way for a lift. In addition, to the west of the lift, a children play area was constructed on the original site of the cloak room whereas the reading room above stayed unchanged. Moreover, there were also the construction of a exhibition room and a self-service café on higher floors.
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 67
- The table and pie charts below show the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010 67
- The pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 and 1991 67
- The maps below show the village of Stakeford in 1930 and 2010 73
- In the last few decades there have been more and more cases of famous people being hounded by the press Some people think that famous people in the media should have no right to privacy To what extent do you agree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: FIRST_GROUND_FLOOR[1]
Message: This word is common for American English. Did you mean 'ground'?
Suggestion: ground
... which was located in the middle of the first floor, overcame no changes over the giv...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...er, there were also the construction of a exhibition room and a self-service café...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition
/var/www/anaconda2/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vaderSentiment/vaderSentiment.py:242: UnicodeWarning: Unicode equal comparison failed to convert both arguments to Unicode - interpreting them as being unequal
if chr in self.emojis:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 208.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95673076923 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62282859613 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 506.74238477 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1533936612 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137900964857 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654281031646 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11077257352 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129664329515 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133660815249 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.