The table and pie charts below show the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.
The given table and pie charts give information about the number of local and international research students in universities in Australia between 2001 and 2010.
Overall, as can be seen from the table and the charts, it can be seen that an upward trend was seen in both the number of local and international research students and the majority of them was the local ones. In addition, the rate of local male students was the highest over the given period.
Looking more closely at the table, in 2001, the number local students doing the research was the higher, at about 33,657 students, while the figure for international students was remarkably lower, at only approximately 5,192 students. After 9 years, there was a significant rise to 39,488 students in the number of local research students. Meanwhile, a noticeable rise of roughly 9,400 students to 14,593 students was seen in the figure for international research ones, leading to a noticeable increase in the number of total students.
According to the pie charts, in 2001, the rate of local male students was the highest, at roughly 44%, while the figure for local female was insignificantly lower, at about 43%. Additonally, while 9% of the total students was non-local female, the non-local male accounted for only 4%. After a period of 9 years later, although a slight decline of 6% to 38% was seen in the proportion of local boys, it still was the highest in the four criteria. Meanwhile, the figure for local girl decreased slightly by 8% to about 35%. By contrast, an increase was seen in the percentage of non-local male and female, to 15% and 12% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-01 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Hoa Kim | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Hoa Kim | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Hoa Kim | 73 | view |
- The plans below show the South Wing of Walton Museum in 2008 and in 2012 56
- The table and pie charts below show the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010 67
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry 70
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90974729242 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79379002034 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42238267148 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.07073170732 654% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3067263162 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.636363636 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201734923861 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104075657394 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126361847835 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199349102814 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161756586047 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.