Pollution of rivers, lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment.
What are the possible causes of water pollution, and what effects does this have on animal life and human society?
Water pollution is a top concern among environmental protectors. This essay discusses some noticeable reasons and their impacts on wildlife species and people in society.
There are two fundamental factors responsible for contamination in rivers, lakes and seas. Firstly, it is because there is a huge amount of toxic waste and litter dumped into the streams. In particular, untreated sewage and household waste disposed of by local residents dramatically pollute the rivers and sea. For example, plastic rubbish which takes a hundred years to decompose can cause congestion in sewers which in runoffs into the ocean and then the waste will be accumulated on the seabed. On the hand unprocessed domestic waste discharged into rivers and seas results in severe polluted conditions. Another element leading to pollution is chemical substances from fertilizers and pesticides from agriculture. These toxins seep into the underground water which flows and then spreads into rivers, lakes, and the ocean.
Some fundamental consequences could be recognized as this issue continues. Firstly, the water population could cause the extinction of wildlife and plants. For example, aquatic species could digest poisonous materials and rubbish in the sea could obscure the fishes’ vision which hinder their ability to feed. This could result in a gradual decline in the number of aquatic animals. Moreover, the effects of pollution on human beings is extremely grave. Inhabitants residing near the polluted rivers or lakes have a high risk to contract fatal diseases such as cancer due to food which are infected by poisons from water sources. Therefore, social health would deteriorate quickly and efforts to find cures for diseases are expensive and will put strain on the countries finances.
In conclusion, the main problems stem from wastes and toxic chemicals poured down the water drains. As a result, the damage could be enormous. This can lead to detrimental effects including the rapid disappearance of animals as well as the deterioration of the health of humans.
.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-02 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | minerva | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | smiley | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | Revivo Tulaseket | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | hanhtienn | 84 | view |
- Pollution of rivers lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment What are the possible causes of water pollution and what effects does this have on animal life and human society 84
- Some people say that boys and girls should study in separate schools while some say that mixed schools are better What is your opinion Give reasons and examples for your answer 92
- Nowadays many families have both parents working Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children while others think childcare centers provide the best care Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The range and quality of food that we can buy has changed because of technological and scientific advances Some people regard this change as an improvement while others believe that it is harmful Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68421052632 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84791681654 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651315789474 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4602282169 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9473684211 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223302964749 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582482976171 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457890817889 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128571170544 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136339875207 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68421052632 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84791681654 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651315789474 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4602282169 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9473684211 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223302964749 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582482976171 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457890817889 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128571170544 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136339875207 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.