Poor nutrition and obesity are a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem. Do you agree?
Recent years have witnessed a significant increase in the availability of fast food. This phenomenon unfortunately leads to malnourishment and obesity, especially in developed countries. To tackle this problem, a commonly held is that government should impose a tax on fast food. Personally, I completely agree with this idea since the tax could reduce fast food consumption and stop the widespread of fast food business.
It seems a fair suggestion that a tax on fast food would reduce the excessive consumption of fast food. These days, this kind of food is convenient and affordable to almost everyone, ranging from the low-income people to the high-income ones. Thus, the tax might encourage people to think twice before choosing an expensive fast food comparing to an economical home-cooked meal. Gradually, this approach could change the eating habits among people, from unbalanced diet into a healthier and more nourishing one. As a result, the chances of having serious health problem such as obesity, diabetes and heart diseases are more likely to decrease.
A general assertion is that the tax also affects the supple chain of fast food in such a way that stops the widespread of fast food business. While the government aims to reduce the fast food intake among citizens, they also lessen the availability of fast food as less businessmen are willing to pour money into fast food stores with decreasing consumption. Moreover, once those businessmen realize the restricting trend towards fast food, they might change their business strategies related to healthy eating to maximize profits.
Excessive consumption of fast food is a serious problem and government need to do something about it. Putting a tax on fast food is a comprehensive solution to the problem, for it affects significantly on not only the consumers but also the suppliers of fast food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | Mtr6510 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | dat | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-08 | thaoly0123 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | yaldaasgari | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun businessmen is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...lessen the availability of fast food as less businessmen are willing to pour money i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs but also the suppliers of fast food.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, while, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21594684385 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9175867127 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2583968554 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312940372657 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124995331803 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076584083695 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219601070283 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395036916344 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.