Poor nutrition and obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food would reduce the problem. Do you agree?
Health problems caused by the excessive consumption of fast food become a typical sign of deteriorating public health all over the world. According to some people, it is important to impose a high tax on junk food to discourage people from eating such food. In my opinion, it should be combined with other drastic solutions to mitigate consequences.
There is no doubt that a tax on fast food would reduce the number of people who intake regularly high fat, high salt processed food. Many people incline to buy this type of food as it is cheap and toothsome. To illustrate, if supermarkets and cafes had to include tax the benefit of the low price would be less.
However, other alternative methods should be taken into consideration. Adding tax to fast food would work much better if governments also implement some measures to alleviate the cost of fruit, vegetables and healthy foods. They could create some laws to ensure that healthier food is almost always the cheapest options and people could buy them easily whatever their social level. Of course it may be difficult for farmers who could lose income to make ends meet. But it would be better for the health of nations. In other word, offering education at school enables to children to learn how to cook at home and to broaden knowledge belong to healthy food. Many people buy ready-made meals and take away because they are not confident in their cooking. If they learn to do this better they may choose healthier meals.
In conclusion, while a higher tax seems to reduce a slightly purchasing, I believe people who well-educated on healthy life is likely to decline the health problems
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | Mtr6510 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | dat | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-08 | thaoly0123 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | yaldaasgari | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 753, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hey are not confident in their cooking. If they learn to do this better they may c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84098939929 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59999606207 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590106007067 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8416269472 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280032340543 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825712512314 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652087778488 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176237606962 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351098699453 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.