As the population grows, the number of cars goes up. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
As the world develops industrially, the number of cars purchased by the population increases. This essay will argue that the drawbacks of this for the nature outweigh the advantages for the single person. This essay will first demonstrate that the carbon footprint of transport is extremely detrimental for the environment and why driving a personal car can lead to other harmful habits, followed by an analysis of how the primary advantage, namely improving living conditions in the economically compromised zones with driving, is not valid.
The main reason to abstain from purchasing an automobile is its constant burning of fossil fuel, which goes up into the atmosphere, creating a greenhouse effect. That is to say that greenhouse gases are the main contributor to the global warming trend that intensifies in speed every year. For example, according to World Wildlife Fund projections for Europe, just a 20% reduction in motor vehicles usage will lower the average temperature rise by 2 degrees per annum. Many individuals tend to buy two or more cars for one family, distancing themselves further and further away from developing an environmental conscience. In other words, as they get used to driving, these groups of people start to ignore other wildlife friendly initiatives, such as carpooling with friends or sorting the rubbish waste. For instance, in Brazil, where a car ride is the most popular way of getting to work, employers report that their staff never uses recycle bins in the office.
Those opposed to this say that in less developed countries having a mean of personal transport, especially for low income parts of the society, can be a tool for survival. However, there is actually no evidence to support this view as in the long-term perspective car usage will lead to deplorable living conditions, replacing the need to commute with the need to survive in the environmentally dare situation. It is well known that Indonesian government, although it hurts a big part of the populous right now, is trying to subside the initiative of transforming the transportation system and developing cycle pathways by putting additional tax on vehicle drivers.
On balance, the fact that driving a car cause irrevocable harm to the world, as well as encourages other nature-negative behaviours clearly outweighs the flawed argument that it’s an essential tool for existence in emerging economies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
- The article states pollution is the main reason for the decline in sea otter population whereas the lecture suggests that predation is the major factor 83
- The pie charts provide information on how money was spent by an American average household in 1970 and in 2004 89
- Some people believe that children should spend all of their free time with their families Others believe that this is unnecessary or even negative Discuss the possible argument on both sides and say which side you personally support 89
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that advertising plays a positive role whereas others refer to its negative impact Do you agree or disagree 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...r Europe, just a 20% reduction in motor vehicles usage will lower the average temperatur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...argument that it’s an essential tool for existence in emerging economies.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24484536082 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97465446549 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623711340206 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.0980203518 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.538461538 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8461538462 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122052309293 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460378174705 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053536658018 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728164455211 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341949018157 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.