There is a deniable fact that color is like the emotions of people. Red stands for anger, yellow is for happiness, blue is for sadness, and green is for envy. So, color does have a close-knit on people's feelings. In my opinion, color arrangements in a formal working environment like the hospital and the less formal one like a kinder garden or an office should be different for some reasons.
First of all, depending on the working system, color compatibility should be applied appropriately. For example, colors in workplaces of professions requiring high concentration like an IT staff should be uniformed and decorated with a calm tone color like brown, dark blue, or black due to colorful scenes draw employee's attention which resulted in low productivity. However, jobs that demand creativity would be the opposite. For instance, an artist's room would be decorated with many different color patterns to stimulate them to come up with many bold ideas and create an energetic atmosphere.
In the hospital environment, however, there are many different departments, so that the color design for the workplaces of specialists differs widely. For example, a pediatrician's room and a NICU usually haves a colorfully painted wall and animal stickers to create a friendly environment for children and infants. Opposed to that, designers should uniform the therapeutic room color for psychiatrists or psychologists, which means that everything has the same bright or dark color. The Post-anesthesia care unit, also known as PACU, is usually provided with shade, assisting the patient in resuscitating faster after surgery.
In conclusion, color does affect people's feelings. According to the color arrangement in workplaces, workers may find it inspires and create a productivity outcome.
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information bu selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...sions requiring high concentration like an IT staff should be uniformed and decorated...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'staffs'?
Suggestion: staffs
...requiring high concentration like an IT staff should be uniformed and decorated with ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 482, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...an artists room would be decorated with many different color patterns to stimulate them to com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ospital environment, however, there are many different departments, so that the color design f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37366548043 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08337062772 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5871886121 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5945912489 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.857142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339177337778 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129028685196 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631504603549 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217901216575 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265491207213 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.